Comic Book Industry Goofs

What has turned out badly inside the business and might it at any point be fixed? The assault and plunder, according to
some, may have left the comic book industry panting for life support. It appears to be that for an
industry that has seen such a lot of progress, the historical backdrop of comic books, has clearly been
frustrated by apparently stupid slip-ups.

The first might have all around been the instituting of the name “comic books”. The earliest adaptations
of the supposed half-tab (for half newspaper) reprints of the Sunday funnies (the comics) became
known as “comic books”. This prompted the reasoning อ่านการ์ตูน as a rule, that comic books contained comic
or on the other hand interesting material, which we as a whole know, is a far stretch from the real world. Comic books can be very
grave, dull or gutsy magazines. It has frequently been recommended that there ought to be another
term begat to all the more likely portray this artistic bundle we as a whole know as comic books. Until this point in time, no
other client companion term has been proposed for use in the comic book industry.

A subsequent confusion came when magazine costs began to rise. Rather than expanding comic
book costs, as other effective magazines did, the comic book industry chose to slice pages to
keep the then current sticker price of a dime. This welcomed on the feeling that comic books
were “modest” by definition, and ignored the way that a dime was truckload of cash at one time
(steak and eggs cost 35 pennies). This introduced the picture that comic books were only for youngsters. It
additionally made the item progressively less reasonable for retail dealers to stock. Why take up the
same rack space, when a more costly magazine would do all the more pleasantly. Again the apparent
worth of the comic book was losing believability.

Then, at that point, as the 1950s moved around, a person by the name of Dr. Frederick Wertham, distributed
a book named “Enticement of the Blameless people”. Using informal examination and
presumptions, he expressed that every one of the country’s ills were straightforwardly connected with kids perusing comic books
(ok well, what?). Fundamental to his proposal, was the misassumption that comic books were rigorously for
kids. The more grown-up material, it was unreasonably accepted, was focused on our sweet, guileless
blameless youngsters. Indeed, we in all actuality do need to safeguard our youngsters, however it actually irritates me greatly, that
certain bombastic people accept their general situation is to cause the remainder of the planet to stick
to their very own convictions. On the off chance that this were the situation, our incredible nation couldn’t ever have been

With this ridiculously unreasonable assault on the comic book industry and numerous legislative pioneers
getting on board with that fleeting trend, comic books were acquiring a terrible standing. The comic book
industry distributers as of now, might have joined together and pronounced that comic books, as
films, were not “only for youngsters”. It ought to have been expressed that the extensive variety of comic book
classes addressed was focus to as wide a scope of perusers. Everything except one of the distributers
(William Gaines, distributer of EC Comics) clasped under to this Legislative Examination and
the Comic Code Authority was made. This represented the substance of comic books and guaranteed
that for the following 15 years or somewhere in the vicinity, the scholarly substance wouldn’t transcend that of pablum for
the psyche. Subsequently one more slide into inconceivability for the comic book industry occurred.

Might the comic book industry at any point be saved? Conceivably, however when the people accountable for the
saving are as enthusiastic as could be expected to mess up the same way once more, what will the result be?
They don’t seem, by all accounts, to be blade enough to commit new errors.